User talk:Ccsmith

From FamilySearch Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
(Maine county pages)
m
Line 233: Line 233:
  
 
:I've walked in your shoes before--I've done the same kind of edits for exactly the same reason on many a Wiki page. Normally, it is the right choice. However, in these cases I consciously chose to risk having the maps covered up because of a problem unique to "clickable" maps. When a header (Level 1, level 2, level 3, etc.) is positioned to the side of a "clickable" map, the clickability near that header is nullified by a bug in the Wiki. This is a bad thing--worse than covered maps which can be fixed by closing some optional and easy-to-close boxes. The best way to address all the layout problems around these maps, and the least-bad choice, is to risk having covered maps. I'm also trying to keep as much of the geographical data within sight of the map as possible. In time I hope that the pages above the map will be lengthened by additional contributions which put the clickable map beyond the reach of overlapping boxes. Outside of these Maine counties, I completely agree with you. Normally, the page width should only be expanded in such a way so that images and maps appear <u>below</u> the space which is (or could be) occupied by all the open boxes. These Maine counties are just a weird exception. [[User:DiltsGD|DiltsGD]] 22:28, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 
:I've walked in your shoes before--I've done the same kind of edits for exactly the same reason on many a Wiki page. Normally, it is the right choice. However, in these cases I consciously chose to risk having the maps covered up because of a problem unique to "clickable" maps. When a header (Level 1, level 2, level 3, etc.) is positioned to the side of a "clickable" map, the clickability near that header is nullified by a bug in the Wiki. This is a bad thing--worse than covered maps which can be fixed by closing some optional and easy-to-close boxes. The best way to address all the layout problems around these maps, and the least-bad choice, is to risk having covered maps. I'm also trying to keep as much of the geographical data within sight of the map as possible. In time I hope that the pages above the map will be lengthened by additional contributions which put the clickable map beyond the reach of overlapping boxes. Outside of these Maine counties, I completely agree with you. Normally, the page width should only be expanded in such a way so that images and maps appear <u>below</u> the space which is (or could be) occupied by all the open boxes. These Maine counties are just a weird exception. [[User:DiltsGD|DiltsGD]] 22:28, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 
[[Category:Scotland_Family_History_Centres]]
 

Revision as of 15:08, 16 June 2013

Contents

9th Virginia

Hi Charles, Thanks for the info on the 9th Virginia. Marilyn Markham created the page you reference. We can take a look at it. All the best, Murphynw 23:52, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

I got it fixed. Thanks Charles! 9th Regiment, Virginia Cavalry (Confederate) Murphynw 17:39, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Wiki Design

Charles, when I deleted the image the search box turned into text.  Can you fix this?  In addition, per Janell's request, would you insert the search box after the image.

Thanks for your help.

Nolaneclark 15:56, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Welcome...

Los Angeles Family History Library

Hi there Ccsmith, I changed the library menu template back to show Mon,Fri,Sat 9 to 5 from your edit Mon - Fri.  We are not open the same hours throughout the week.  The listing was correct that you changed.  We appreciate your concern.  It would be more helpful in the future if you let us know what you want us to change on our site, so our Wiki people can work it in if the Library Director approves you input.

 Thanks so much,

 Warren Daniel, Los Angeles Family History Library WIKI trainer, for the Library Director


 

Hello Ccsmith!

The Welcoming Committee is here to support you and offer you a warm welcome to a Community that loves Family History. We thank you for your contributions! Please continue editing and consider joining in Projects Seeking Contributors or a live Community Meeting where you may meet other experienced users and contributors.

This message is posted on your Talk Page which is associated with your personal User Page. Try creating a User Page about yourself, it's a great place to practice new skills and lets others know something about you and your genealogical interests. We hope you like this place and decide to join in.

Here are a few pages you may find helpful:

You may find additional editing and technical assistance from experienced contributors in the forums at Forums.FamilySearch.org. Please sign your name only on discussion/talk pages. If you need personal assistance, feel free to contact Welcoming Committee Members.

Again, welcome! Kara 14:55, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Virginia parishes

Sorry Elder Smith. I'll fix these Virginia parish categories. I've been doing it piecemeal and will need to figure out which counties each parish serves. Should have it done by the end of the week. Murphynw 17:55, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Montgomery County, Kentucky Navbox

Hi Charles,

Jimmy suggested that I leave you a note about your work on the Montgomery County, Kentucky page. I see that you have successfully created a county navbox. At the moment you've added the code for the navbox directly to the page, which is OK, but if you wanted to use the navbox on many pages, the way to do this is to create the navbox in the "Template" namespace. If you are new to the wiki this will be new to you, but I'm willing to guide you through the process. --Steve 21:14, 1 October 2010 (UTC)


Blanking out pages

Hi, I'm Dorothy Horan. I work with the pages that describe digital collections published in fsbeta.I've notified that you have blanked out redirects from some articles in the wiki, including ones that we created. When that happens, the wiki users are led to a blank page which might lead them to believe that there isn't another article available to give them that data.


What we need to do with those pages is to mark them for deletion. The redirects are supposed to be temporary until someone who deletes pages can delete the non-essential pages.

Thanks for helping out! Let me know if you have any questions. -- Horandm 30 November 2010. 

Categories for US Military categories

Hi Charles, I have today amended some categories relating to US military categories (for example Category:Illinois - Military). I noticed that many of these categories had themselves as the category, resulting in a category loop. The change I've made is to have them added to two category, 1) relating to the state and 2) relating to US State Military Records. I've sorted the state category with the word Military and the US State Military Records with the name of the state. I hope you see the logic behind this change. --Steve 12:55, 7 December 2010 (UTC)


Categories for Civil War Pages

We appreciate your willingness to try to improve the Wiki. We have a team that is creating pages for the Civil War regiments for 33 states.  Most pages are not done, so please don't change anything yet.  Please contact me before changing anything. 

Would you please change all categories of the Ohio in the Civil War pages back to what they were?  I really do want Ohio - Military - Civil War, 1861-1865, NOT Ohio - Military.  The same for the Arkansas in the Civil War pages.  The categories have not be made yet, but I'll do it soon.  Thank you, Marilyn


Hello!

Dear FamilySearch Historical Records Contributor,


We noticed you recently contributed to one of our articles and we wanted to send out a quick thank you for contributing to a FamilySearch Historical Records' article. You may not know it, but this is a new project that is just getting off the ground and your contribution helps! The information you provide is invaluable to those users who are searching out further information about collections in FamilySearch; it helps them make a deeper connection with their research, especially when it has to do with their own ancestry. It’s your contributions that are keeping the project rolling forward. Thank you.


We'd love to have you become part of our community here. We've got lots of ways to get involved a little deeper into the project and what the project entails: https://wiki.familysearch.org/en/FamilySearch_Wiki:WikiProject_FamilySearch_Records. In this page you will find information about the FamilySearch Records project, getting started in wiki editing, tasks for which you can sign up to volunteer, etc. We are excited you have decided to share your talents, time and resources towards forwarding the goals of FamilySearch.org and those who use it (including you!).


If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us. We’d love to hear from you and help you out in any way we can.


Sincerely,


The FamilySearch Records Team


User:HoranDM
User:LakeCL
User:ginabegin

FamilySearch Centres

Spelling

Henry995 You have created FamilySearch Centre pages for Britain with Americanised spelling of the word Centre (Center) may I suggest that you edit these to the correct English spelling throughout the page(s) as Americanised spellings are not popular outside the USA/Canada.

I agree with Henry, English users would not search for a family history center but a family history centre. Also do we need to have the word England in the title? Yes with these are the official names, but they are not the common names that patrons would search for. Finally the Isle of Wight is part of England so doesn't need it's own category. --Steve 07:12, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi Charles, I see that you created the page FamilySearch Wiki:Family History Centers Naming and Content. I have added a proposed style guide regarding this issue to that page. --Steve 08:01, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Stubs

Hi Charles, just to let you know that I have created a new stub template {{FHC-stub}} to indentify FHC articles that need filling out with detail. I have included in the stub template a link to the instructions and guidelines for FHC and so I have replace the current code for this link with the template. Once a page has been edited with the details of the center then the stub template can be removed. Until then each article in addition to being categorised by with the other FHC in the same state/country they will be be found in Category:Family History Center stubs. --Steve 12:11, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Jersey Family History Centre

Hi Charles, I see that you have renamed the Jersey Family History Centre to add the city name. However as I explained on the talk page, it is only named this within the LDS Church. As the wiki is written with a general point of view, I think it is important that articles are named using terms that are most common, ie those that will be used by most people to find them. --Steve 07:07, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Spanish and Portuguese content in the English wiki

Hi Charles, I noticed that today you have created {{FHC-stub Spanish}} template, and previously the {{FHC page outline Spanish}} and {{FHC page outline Portuguese}} templates. These template belong in either the Spanish or Portuguese Wikis and not in the English language wiki. There is a template {{H-langs}} that can be used to link an English article to the article on the same subject in the other wikis. Content in the English wiki should always be in English. --Steve

Edits to {{FHCpage}}

Hi Charles, please review the comments I have added to the Template talk:FHCpage. I would welcome your feedback. --Steve 05:30, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Baker City FHC

This might surprise you. I'm native of Baker City, Oregon. FamilySearch continues to use "Baker" instead of "Baker City" despite the fact the locals do not refer to Baker at all since at least 1985. Even the wards there are referred to as Baker City First Ward and Baker City Second Ward and officially as such in meetinghouse locator directory. They are not going to look for Baker Oregon FHC, they're looking for Baker City, Oregon FHC. Dsammy 17:13, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

There is a workaround solution to this. actual page stays and masked Baker Oregon... and type |Baker City Oregon Family History Center. Search engine pick up this one, and nobody the wise to it. Dsammy 19:24, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Downloaded6243127676072404131 Family+history+Center+map.png missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Downloaded6243127676072404131 Family+history+Center+map.png is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Image use. Thank you. --Steve (talk| contribs) 18:39, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
It's Chandler Arizona. Figured out using two unique crosspoints of two streets. Dsammy 18:57, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Chiang Mai Thailand Family History Center

Charles-

I note that you started the beginning edits on this Family History Center. Since your first two edits it has been edited by a person named " Anupong". Two questions do you know " Anpong" or who this person is? And why is the Family History Center named after this family Chiang Mai in Thailand ? Thanks Charles I am always interested in what you say in the  Contributors meetings  Dawne 21:47, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Featured Article THANK YOU!

Hi Ccsmith,


The FamilySearch Research Wiki is delighted to let you know that the Italy page you helped create has become a Featured Article', highlighted on the Main Page of the Wiki, and will remain there for seven days. Thank you for your excellent work to help others quickly access records. Your contributions are appreciated and will help others find their ancestors.<br>'You have made a difference in research!

Translation template

Hi Charles, following the technical meeting today, I have uploaded a new image File:Ambox translate.png and used this to illustrate a new template {{translation needed}}. I have written some documentation and added some examples. I'm thinking of a way to include a link to where the translated text needs to go, but feel free to let me have any comments on the image and template as they are now. --Steve (talk| contribs) 23:21, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

RecordSearch Template

Hi, I noticed that you created the template "RecordSearch" on the Spanish Wiki. I already created the same template with instructions in Spanish last week but named it "BuscarColección". Since there should only be one copy of each template I redirected "RecordSearch" to "BuscarColección". Hope this OK with you.

The templates are exactly the same except for the name. Using either "RecordSearch" or "BuscarColección" will now work. -- Lotje2 23:36, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

FamilySearch Collection Template

Hi, I noticed you were having a problem with the "FamilySearch Collection" template when you moved it over to the Spanish wiki. I'm guessing that the problem was that some of the headers for the pages you copied to your sandbox weren't working. You were very close in tracking down the problem. Many of the older FamilySearch Historical Records pages use the old template "Record Search article" that redirects to the "FamilySearch Collection" template. So that template needed to be created on the Spanish wiki and redirected as well. I did this and restored the code for the "FamilySearch Collection" template. I think it will work correctly now if you copy and paste the headers from the English wiki. I also updated the categories in the code so all FamilySearch Historical Records Collections moved to the Spanish wiki will automatically categorize into Categoría:Registros Históricos de FamilySearch under the name of the country that is in the location= section of the FamilySearch Collection template. Lotje2 19:22, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Uploading images

Hi, can you or someone else upload the following images from the English wiki to the Spanish wiki for me. Thanks, Lotje2 21:30, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Ambox translate.png
  • Deletion icon.svg.png
  • Merge.png
  • Icon-warning.png
  • Important.png
  • Information icon.png
  • Question.png
  • Broom icon.png
  • Move.png
  • Gotoarrow.png
  • Globe.png
  • Books-Computer-Film.png
  • Template-info.svg.png
  • FamilySearchTree.png
  • Help-content.png

Thank you for uploading these. Everything looks more polished with the images added. Lotje2 19:47, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Known Issues pages

I recently copied the {{HR Known Issues}} template to the Spanish wiki and translated it so that "FamilySearch Historical Records" pages that have a "Known Issues" section and {{HR Known Issues}} flag can be duplicated on the Spanish wiki and will display the flag and link correctly. The template creates a link to the "Known Issues" sub-page for the collection.

I also copied and translated the {{HR Known Issues-page}} header, so that the "Known Issues" pages themselves can be translated and display the header correctly. The templates have the same names as on the English wiki. Lotje2 01:41, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Help pages

I noticed you were working on translating some of the help pages into Spanish on the English wiki. I copied the templates needed to create pages with "tabs" to the Spanish wiki. This should make it possible for you to move the pages to the Spanish wiki and have them display properly. Lotje2 19:06, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Projects

I noticed that you appeared to be running the equivalent of several WikiProjects out of your sandboxes. I created a few WikiProject project workspaces on the Spanish Wiki that you can use. You don't have to use them of course, I created them mainly to see if the tabs template and userbox templates were working correctly. If you do choose to use them however, change them however you'd like, they are all yours. I just set them up basically as examples of what can be done. If you don't need them you can mark them for deletion.

Note about tabs on the Spanish wiki: Please notice that I used the Lengüeta templates to create the project workspaces which is different than the Start tab and End tab's used on some of the help pages. Both templates are on the Spanish wiki but the Lengüeta one is more simple.

As I mentioned above, there are userboxes as well, you can now use the meta-template Userbox to create userboxes. Lotje2 18:15, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Page left on deleted Category. The following page: Template:FHC page outline British spelling has been left on the deleted page Category:Scotland Family History Centers and needs to be moved to. Thanks Charles. Sandralpond 14:00, 1 December 2012 (UTC)


Talk Page Notification

Tag -- You've had a comment posted on your Talk Page for example.

--Ldrew 17:04, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Maine county pages

The reason I changed the width of the page to 100% is so that when the boxes (Research, Volunteer, etc) on the right are extended they will not cover up the image of the county map. Not everyone will have these boxes in their up position. We could widen the text below these extended boxes for the rest of the material on the page, however. Ccsmith 23:54, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

I've walked in your shoes before--I've done the same kind of edits for exactly the same reason on many a Wiki page. Normally, it is the right choice. However, in these cases I consciously chose to risk having the maps covered up because of a problem unique to "clickable" maps. When a header (Level 1, level 2, level 3, etc.) is positioned to the side of a "clickable" map, the clickability near that header is nullified by a bug in the Wiki. This is a bad thing--worse than covered maps which can be fixed by closing some optional and easy-to-close boxes. The best way to address all the layout problems around these maps, and the least-bad choice, is to risk having covered maps. I'm also trying to keep as much of the geographical data within sight of the map as possible. In time I hope that the pages above the map will be lengthened by additional contributions which put the clickable map beyond the reach of overlapping boxes. Outside of these Maine counties, I completely agree with you. Normally, the page width should only be expanded in such a way so that images and maps appear below the space which is (or could be) occupied by all the open boxes. These Maine counties are just a weird exception. DiltsGD 22:28, 15 June 2013 (UTC)