Talk:Use Appropriate FormsEdit This Page
From FamilySearch Wiki
Research Extract Forms repeat 86% of the things that should be written on Research Logs anyway. This is highly redundant. We would require a really good reason to justify such a redundant form on this page. It is hard to imagine a situation where filling out BOTH a research log and a Research Extract Form would be a good use of genealogical research time.
The 14% new material is whether the information is direct or indirect, primary or secondary. These could easily enough be noted on the copies of the material without requiring researchers to fill out what amounts to a duplicate research log.
- This page was last modified on 11 December 2011, at 00:57.
- This page has been accessed 570 times.
We want your opinion!
Give feedback on two US state pages by clicking on the purple button belowClick Here