FamilySearch Wiki talk:WikiProject Professional Genealogists

From FamilySearch Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
(Added heading)
(Changed heading)
Line 31: Line 31:
 
To make it even easier for patrons to find professional help, links to these directory pages would be created from other existing wiki pages. So a page like "Ohio Vital Records" would contain a link to "Professional Genealogists Serving Ohio." The link's wording might be something like "For a list of professional genealogists who can procure vital records, see 'Professional Genealogists Serving Ohio.'"  
 
To make it even easier for patrons to find professional help, links to these directory pages would be created from other existing wiki pages. So a page like "Ohio Vital Records" would contain a link to "Professional Genealogists Serving Ohio." The link's wording might be something like "For a list of professional genealogists who can procure vital records, see 'Professional Genealogists Serving Ohio.'"  
  
=== Linking to service providers is no more commercial than linking to fee-based digitized records  ===
+
== Isn't this awfully commercial for a wiki? ==
  
Some folks worry about linking wiki pages to professional genealogists. But the wiki already has thousands of links to commercial offerings -- most of them digitized records available for a fee. Professional genealogists provide the same kinds of information these fee-based digital record sites do -- they just do it in a more customized way. If genealogy were the food industry, the big companies that offer digital records might be likened to a McDonald's or a Stauffer's, whereas the professional researcher might be a mom-and-pop restaurant. If the wiki's Ohio Vital Records page can link to a Website of a company offering digitized records for a fee, why should it not also link to Websites of professionals offering to find similar records for a fee?  
+
Some folks worry about linking wiki pages to professional genealogists. But the wiki already has thousands of links to commercial offerings -- most of them digitized records available for a fee. Professional genealogists provide the same kinds of information these fee-based digital record sites do -- they just do it in a more customized way. If genealogy were the food industry, the big companies that offer digital records might be likened to a McDonald's or a Stauffer's, whereas the professional researcher might be a mom-and-pop restaurant. If the wiki's Ohio Vital Records page can link to a Website of a company offering digitized records for a fee, why should it not also link to Websites of professionals offering to find similar records for a fee?
  
 
=== Your input is welcome below  ===
 
=== Your input is welcome below  ===

Revision as of 19:59, 23 July 2012

Contents

Why this project?

Background

In early 2008, Don Anderson, Director of the Patron Services Division at FamilySearch, (the division that developed the wiki, still supports it, and contributes half of its content) directed me to invite professional genealogists to the wiki to promote their services there.

Objectives

Two objectives drove this decision. First, we wanted professional researchers to add content to the wiki, and one way to incentivate them to discover how easy it is to edit wiki pages would be to invite them to create pages that would help patrons find them.

The second objective was to satisfy our patrons' need to find professional help. Many FamilySearch patrons need professional help solving tough research problems, and they often ask us who to hire. Today there's no clear answer: APG, BCG, ICAPGen, various international organizations, various members-only Websites, a constellation of research firms and mom-and-pop shops, and a veritable universe of individual freelancers. The choices are myriad, and this is confusing to patrons. They would like to have one place that will show them everyone they could hire, all on a level playing field.

Alternatives in the market

Many directories of professional genealogists exist, but most charge fees for a listing, so none of them really approach comprehensiveness. A directory on FamilySearch Wiki, where researchers can write their own listings for free, has the potential of becoming comprehensive. To patrons who need professional help, the wiki could become the best place to find a complete listing of professional researchers.

What will the pages look like?

Inclusive information

The idea is to have researchers post their genealogical education, professional and volunteer experience, credentials, report samples, specialties, services, contact information, and links to their business Websites on their wiki user pages and subpages. There would be other pages on the wiki like "Professional Genealogists Serving Ohio" or "Professional Genealogists Who Do Ohio Research" that would list all the professionals for the area in a table and link to their user pages.

Types of wiki pages to use

Part of the thinking around having this information on user pages is that user pages are not included by default on the wiki's search engine. When you do a search on the wiki, the search engine ignores user pages by default. So user pages are a great place to "hide in plain sight." When wiki users add information to their user pages, they are not spamming the wiki's search engine.

Besides these resume items on a professional genealogist's user page, there would be directory pages like "Professional Genealogists Serving Ohio" which would contain a table listing professionals and linking to their user pages for more information. These directory pages would be normal wiki pages in the main namespace, and would therefore appear by default on a wiki search. This is ideal because it would help patrons find professionals when they need help.

Links from other pages to directories

To make it even easier for patrons to find professional help, links to these directory pages would be created from other existing wiki pages. So a page like "Ohio Vital Records" would contain a link to "Professional Genealogists Serving Ohio." The link's wording might be something like "For a list of professional genealogists who can procure vital records, see 'Professional Genealogists Serving Ohio.'"

Isn't this awfully commercial for a wiki?

Some folks worry about linking wiki pages to professional genealogists. But the wiki already has thousands of links to commercial offerings -- most of them digitized records available for a fee. Professional genealogists provide the same kinds of information these fee-based digital record sites do -- they just do it in a more customized way. If genealogy were the food industry, the big companies that offer digital records might be likened to a McDonald's or a Stauffer's, whereas the professional researcher might be a mom-and-pop restaurant. If the wiki's Ohio Vital Records page can link to a Website of a company offering digitized records for a fee, why should it not also link to Websites of professionals offering to find similar records for a fee?

Your input is welcome below

As FamilySearch embarks on this project, we welcome your input as to how we might do it best. Please leave your comments below, thanks for sharing, and remember to "sign" your comments with four tildes [nowiki] RitcheyMT 12:10, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[/nowiki]! RitcheyMT 12:10, 19 July 2012 (UTC)


My major concern is how you will distance FamilySearch from poor performing individuals. By listing the names of people, you are implying endorcement of them and their services. Therefore poor service will reflect negatively on FamilySearch.
Second, why did Ancestry.com discontinue listing professional genealogists? Has FamilySearch addressed these reasons? Klk3 16:54, 19 July 2012 (UTC)


From the start of my involvement with the wiki, there have been concerns that relate to the fact that steering readers to the best possible resources may mean directing them to a "for pay" site. In a way, steering them to a professional isn't all that different, but I am concerned about muddling wiki contributor mechanisms for sharing and communicating, with pages for people that have no connection at all to the wiki. User pages should be strictly limited to those who contribute to the wiki, for example. It seems to me that a listing of professionals with fairly minimal information about them would be a better way to remain neutral and "arm's-length" from appearing to endorse researchers. Lise 18:45, 19 July 2012 (UTC)