Old microfilm number conversion 25989-26018Edit This Page

From FamilySearch Wiki

Revision as of 18:40, 27 March 2013 by Sandralpond (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

[Go to the previous page]

Old microfilm number conversion of Family History Library numbers used before 1973 may be accomplished with the table below:

Old Serial Part No. New Number Old Serial Part No. New Number Old Serial Part No. New Number
025989 00020 0192967 025998  00006 0192996 026008 00001 0193025
  00021 0192968 025999 00001 0192997   00002 0193026
  00022 0192969   00002 0192998 026009 00001 0193027
  00023 0192970   00003 0192999   00002 0193028
  00024 0192971   00004 0193000   00003 0193029
  00025 0192972   00005 0193001   00004 0193030
025990   0192973   00006 0193002 026010 00001 0193031
025991 00001 0192974   00007 0193003   00002 0193032
  00002 0192975   00008 0193004 026011   0193033
  00003 0192976   00009 0193005 026012 00001 0193034
  00004 0192977   00010 0193006   00002 0193035
  00005 0192978   00011 0193007 026013 00001 0193036
  00006 0192979   00012 0193008   00002 0193037
  00007 0192980   00013 0193009 026014   0193038
025992 00001 0192981   00014 0193010 026015 00001 0193039
  00002 0192982   00015 0193011   00002 0193040
025993   0192983   00016 0193012   00003 0193041
025994 00001 0192984 026000   0193013   00004 0193042
  00002 0192985 026001     0193014   00005 0193043
025995 0192986 026002    0193015   00006 0193044
025996  00001 0192987 026003    0193016 026016 00001 0193045
  00002 0192988 026004    0193017   00002 0193046
  00003 0192989 026005  00001 0193018   00003 0193047
025997   0192990   00002 0193019 026017 00001 0193048
025998 00001 0192991   00003 0193020   00002 0193049
  00002 0192992 026006    0193021   00003 0193050
  00003 0192993 026007  00001 0193022   00004 0193051
  00004 0192994   00002 0193023 026018 00001 0193052
  00005 0192995   00003 0193024   00002 0193053

  [Go to next page]


 

Need wiki, indexing, or website help? Contact our product teams.


Did you find this article helpful?

You're invited to explain your rating on the discussion page (you must be signed in).