St Stephen Coleman Street, London GenealogyEdit This Page

From FamilySearch Wiki

Revision as of 13:59, 26 December 2011 by Murphynw (Talk | contribs)

England Gotoarrow.png London Gotoarrow.png London Parishes Gotoarrow.png St Stephen Coleman Street


Parish History

"St Stephen Coleman Street, the church of, is situated near the south end of the west side of this street, and derives its name and addition..."[1]



Pallot: 1780-1837


1541 Subsidy

1582 Subsidy

Probate records

Records of wills, administrations, inventories, indexes, etc. were filed by the court with jurisdiction over this parish.

Before 1858, St Stephen Coleman Street, London Genealogy fell under the jurisdiction of the Court of the Commissary of the Bishop of London.

Go to London Probate Records to find the names of the courts having secondary jurisdiction. Scroll down in the article to the section Court Jurisdictions by Parish.

From 1858 to the present, refer to the Principal Probate Registry.


Transcripts of early St Stephen Coleman Street, London Genealogy tombs found in the interior of the church were published in Catalogue of the most Memorable Persons who had visible Tombs, plated Gravestones ... in the City of London (through) A.D. 1700, which is available online.[2]

A cemetery survey (1910), available online, covers monumental inscriptions in the St Stephen Coleman Street churchyard.[3]

Web Sites

Wikipedia has more about this subject: St Stephen Coleman Street


  1. James Elmes, M.R. I. A., Architect, A Topographical Dictionary of London and its Envirions (London: Whittaker, Treacher and Arnot, 1831). Adapted. Digital version: Google Books.
  2. Payne Fisher and G. Blacker Morgan, Catalogue of the Tombs in the Churches of the City of London, A.D. 1666 (1668; reprint, London: Hasell, Watson, Viney, Ld., 1885). Digitised by Internet Archive.
  3. Percy C. Rushden, The Churchyard Inscriptions of the City of London (London: Phillimore and Co., Ltd., 1910). Digitised by Internet Archive.


Need wiki, indexing, or website help? Contact our product teams.

Did you find this article helpful?

You're invited to explain your rating on the discussion page (you must be signed in).