Sweden Soldier NamesEdit This Page

From FamilySearch Wiki

Revision as of 21:25, 11 September 2008 by LarsonW (Talk | contribs)

When a man entered into military service in Sweden, it was often the case that he would acquire a new surname. This practice was necessary to avoid the ensuing confusion of having several soldiers with the same given and patronymic surnames. For example, how could 10 men all named Olof OLOFSSON know when his name was called, that he was the desired individual. Therefore, to avoid this confusion new soldiers were assigned a new surname. These surnames often were references to aspects of military life, such as Modig (courageous), Tapper (brave), Frimodig (fearless, frank), and Stark (strong). Sometimes, references were made to weaponry. Examples of this practice are Svärd (sword), Skjöld (shield), Spjut (spear), and Lans (lance).

Certain military surnames were assigned to the soldier residence found in nearly every parish. As the new recruit took over for his predecessor, the recruit assumed the surname assigned to that particular soldier residence. The Swedish researcher should refrain from assuming that there is an existing familial relationship between two men who share the same soldier surname. Rarely, is there a family connection between two soldiers with similar surnames.

Soldier surnames can indicate a reference to the locale from where a soldier may have come. For example, the surname EKBERG may indicate that the soldier is from a place called “Ekeby”.

Children of a soldier father had the option of taking their father’s military surname as their personal surname or instead, may have decided to take their correct patronymical surname, based upon their father’s given name. For example, the children of soldier Anders LJUNGSTRÖM may have used either the LJUNGSTRÖM surname or chosen instead to be known as ANDERSSON/ANDERSDOTTER

Some examples of common Swedish soldier surnames can be found below:



Need wiki, indexing, or website help? Contact our product teams.

Did you find this article helpful?

You're invited to explain your rating on the discussion page (you must be signed in).