Talk:Scotland Births and Baptisms (FamilySearch Historical Records)

From FamilySearch Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
(no dialogue no post)
(added comment)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
Previous content on this page has been put on the [[Talk:Scotland_Births_and_Baptisms_(FamilySearch_Historical_Records)/Archive_1]].
 
Previous content on this page has been put on the [[Talk:Scotland_Births_and_Baptisms_(FamilySearch_Historical_Records)/Archive_1]].
 +
 +
I have noticed that the ''FamilySearch Historical Records'' articles all have sections named '''Related Websites''' and '''Related Wiki Articles'''.  Every link in every article is related.  I think these setion titles should be replaced with personalized section headings.  Such as in this article it would be '''Civil Registration and Church Records''' since these are the two topics and material that is directly related to 'Scotland Births and Baptisms (FamilySearch Historical Records'  This claifies the relationship for the reader. Why would the section be listed as 'Related' when you can idenify the exact the relationship? 
 +
[[User:Donjgen|Donjgen]] 21:56, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:56, 27 June 2012

Scotland Births and Baptisms (FamilySearch Historical Records)

Previous content on this page has been put on the Talk:Scotland_Births_and_Baptisms_(FamilySearch_Historical_Records)/Archive_1.

I have noticed that the FamilySearch Historical Records articles all have sections named Related Websites and Related Wiki Articles. Every link in every article is related. I think these setion titles should be replaced with personalized section headings. Such as in this article it would be Civil Registration and Church Records since these are the two topics and material that is directly related to 'Scotland Births and Baptisms (FamilySearch Historical Records' This claifies the relationship for the reader. Why would the section be listed as 'Related' when you can idenify the exact the relationship? Donjgen 21:56, 27 June 2012 (UTC)