Talk:Scotland Births and Baptisms (FamilySearch Historical Records)

From FamilySearch Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
(added comment)
(letter)
(36 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The two collections you referred to
+
[[Scotland Births and Baptisms (FamilySearch Historical Records)]] <br>
:Scotland Births and Baptisms
+
:Scotland Marriages
+
consist primarily of IGI entries. They may also include some on-line indexing projects. However, when we identify included indexing projects, those projects are removed and posted as their own collection. [[User:TimothyNB|TimothyNB]]
+
  
I deleted the image of the Wallace Monument which I felt added no value to the page and took up too much space.&nbsp; Others may feel differently.&nbsp;&nbsp;
+
Previous content on this page has been put on the [[Talk:Scotland Births and Baptisms (FamilySearch Historical Records)/Archive 1]].  
  
I find part of this description misleading.&nbsp; To my knowledge the Historical Records collections do NOT include info submitted by individuals researching their own ancestry.&nbsp;The sample source citations do not seem helpful in relation to this database.&nbsp; I feel this description needs more editing than I am willing to do or should do.&nbsp; This may also apply to the description for the Scotland Marriages database which I haven't read. [[User:BakerBH|BakerBH]] 23:17, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
+
I have noticed that the ''FamilySearch Historical Records'' articles all have sections named '''Related Websites''' and '''Related Wiki Articles'''. Every link in every article is related. I think these setion titles should be replaced with personalized section headings. Such as in this article it would be '''Civil Registration and Church Records''' since these are the two topics and material that is directly related to 'Scotland Births and Baptisms (FamilySearch Historical Records' This claifies the relationship for the reader. Why would the section be listed as 'Related' when you can idenify the exact the relationship? [[User:Donjgen|Donjgen]] 21:56, 27 June 2012 (UTC)  
  
It appears that much of the information on the site comes from a pre drawn template that is on most of the wiki articles relating to 'FamilySearch Historical Rcords'  If I were you I would edit it now or I will soon  [[User:Donjgen|Donjgen]] 21:56, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
+
== Scotland Births and Baptisms ==
 +
 
 +
The Featured Article Committee is looking at some of the articles in the Research Wiki to see if they are ready to be put on the featured article candidate list.&nbsp; We find some very good and useful material in this article but also find a box that says "this&nbsp;section is incomplete".&nbsp; &nbsp;We would like to ask that someone with knowledge of this article do some editing to correct&nbsp;this issues&nbsp; [https://familysearch.org/learn/wiki/en/FamilySearch_Wiki:Featured_Article_Committee Welcome Committee]
 +
 
 +
&lt;br&gt; <br>

Revision as of 19:48, 26 July 2012

Scotland Births and Baptisms (FamilySearch Historical Records)

Previous content on this page has been put on the Talk:Scotland Births and Baptisms (FamilySearch Historical Records)/Archive 1.

I have noticed that the FamilySearch Historical Records articles all have sections named Related Websites and Related Wiki Articles. Every link in every article is related. I think these setion titles should be replaced with personalized section headings. Such as in this article it would be Civil Registration and Church Records since these are the two topics and material that is directly related to 'Scotland Births and Baptisms (FamilySearch Historical Records' This claifies the relationship for the reader. Why would the section be listed as 'Related' when you can idenify the exact the relationship? Donjgen 21:56, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Scotland Births and Baptisms

The Featured Article Committee is looking at some of the articles in the Research Wiki to see if they are ready to be put on the featured article candidate list.  We find some very good and useful material in this article but also find a box that says "this section is incomplete".   We would like to ask that someone with knowledge of this article do some editing to correct this issues  Welcome Committee

<br>