Talk:Surry County, North Carolina

From FamilySearch Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
:The statement does not belong there and had been removed. This wiki is designed to be neutral. The rest of information is based on the facts - that is the occurances and arrivals of surnames and settlers. Nothing more. [[User:Dsammy|Dsammy]] 15:46, 1 April 2011 (UTC)<br>
 
:The statement does not belong there and had been removed. This wiki is designed to be neutral. The rest of information is based on the facts - that is the occurances and arrivals of surnames and settlers. Nothing more. [[User:Dsammy|Dsammy]] 15:46, 1 April 2011 (UTC)<br>
 +
It is precisely because the wiki is designed to be neutral that the inclusion of such "facts" in the introductory section of the Surry County page is extremely inappropriate. Such "facts" should be subject to debate and discussion, as should any genealogical pedigree. To say that these are facts are to say that someone's assessment of someone's research is perfect and could not possibly contain errors.

Revision as of 19:38, 1 April 2011

Providing information about specific local families in the "Brief History" section would seem like a nice idea. This material, as presented here, is problematic, however, in that broad, sweeping statements are made about the origins of certain families without documentation and without room for discussion. Pedigrees need, of course, to be constructed using documentation, and then they need to be open to criticism for others. The format does not allow that. This hardly seems the place to present statements as to the origins of specific families as incontrovertible fact. User:Melungeon

The statement does not belong there and had been removed. This wiki is designed to be neutral. The rest of information is based on the facts - that is the occurances and arrivals of surnames and settlers. Nothing more. Dsammy 15:46, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

It is precisely because the wiki is designed to be neutral that the inclusion of such "facts" in the introductory section of the Surry County page is extremely inappropriate. Such "facts" should be subject to debate and discussion, as should any genealogical pedigree. To say that these are facts are to say that someone's assessment of someone's research is perfect and could not possibly contain errors.