User talk:Familyjournals

From FamilySearch Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
(need another opinion)
(Asked about FamilyJournals' favorite articles)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
==== I'm working to help w/ your trouble  ====
 
==== I'm working to help w/ your trouble  ====
  
I've been forwarded some e-mails showing some trouble you've been having from another user stemming from his ideas of what your content should look like. ;)  I appreciate your patience with this really rotten situation. I'm studying some policies and procedures Wikipedia has that will prevent this kind of thing in the future. I just wanted you to know I am on the case, but it'll take some time because I'm incredibly stacked up with tasks right now. [[User:Ritcheymt|Ritcheymt]] 12:19, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
+
I've been forwarded some e-mails showing some trouble you've been having from another user stemming from his ideas of what your content should look like. ;)  I appreciate your patience with this really rotten situation. I'm studying some policies and procedures Wikipedia has that will prevent this kind of thing in the future. I just wanted you to know I am on the case, but it'll take some time because I'm incredibly stacked up with tasks right now. [[User:Ritcheymt|Ritcheymt]] 12:19, 24 February 2009 (UTC)  
  
 
==== We need your opinion  ====
 
==== We need your opinion  ====
Line 28: Line 28:
  
 
*[[FamilySearch Wiki talk:Format for Citing and Linking to Works in FHLC, Worldcat (OCLC)|FamilySearch Wiki talk:Format for Citing and Linking to Works in FHLC, Worldcat (OCLC)]]  
 
*[[FamilySearch Wiki talk:Format for Citing and Linking to Works in FHLC, Worldcat (OCLC)|FamilySearch Wiki talk:Format for Citing and Linking to Works in FHLC, Worldcat (OCLC)]]  
*[[FamilySearch Wiki talk:Consensus |FamilySearch Wiki talk:Consensus]]  
+
*[[FamilySearch Wiki talk:Consensus|FamilySearch Wiki talk:Consensus]]  
*[[FamilySearch Wiki talk:Source Citation Formats |FamilySearch Wiki talk:Source Citation Formats]]   
+
*[[FamilySearch Wiki talk:Source Citation Formats|FamilySearch Wiki talk:Source Citation Formats]]   
*[[FamilySearch Wiki talk:Disambiguation |FamilySearch Wiki talk:Disambiguation]]
+
*[[FamilySearch Wiki talk:Disambiguation|FamilySearch Wiki talk:Disambiguation]]
  
 
Thanks! [[User:Ritcheymt|Ritcheymt]] 12:13, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 
Thanks! [[User:Ritcheymt|Ritcheymt]] 12:13, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
== What's your best work? And your favorites from others?  ==
 +
 +
Hey there FamilyJournals! I'm searching for the wiki's best content to highlight it during a presentation I'm doing soon. Will you link me to a couple articles you've contributed to that you are most pleased with? Also, could you link me to your favorite article(s) written by others? Thanks! [[User:Ritcheymt|Ritcheymt]] 17:06, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:06, 8 July 2009

Contents

Soliciting your opinion

Hey FamilyJournals, will you weigh in on "Local Histories" or "Histories" heading on county pages? I want to reach consensus on this quickly in order to get a big missionary team engaged in FamilySearch Wiki:WikiProject Linking to Books in the BYU Family History Archives. Thanks in advance! Ritcheymt 13:46, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Nice Maryland Societies page!

Hey FamilyJournals, I just wanted you to know I really like what you're doing with the Maryland Societies page! Ritcheymt 01:28, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you Michael
FamilyJournals 03:18, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Washington county cemeteries

Found the Washington County cemeteries page on interment.net, just six cemeteries, but they may be ones not on findagrave.  http://www.interment.net/us/md/washington.htm   JamesAnderson 02:37, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you James! I had actually already used that interment.net information on the Washington County page. Those cemeteries on that page are from various transcriptions, most are from findagrave but there are a few surprises in there. I appreciate your interest! Thank you.
Familyjournals 03:19, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Nice work on Maryland Military Records!

Hey there! Great work on Maryland Military Records! Thanks! Ritcheymt 18:58, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks! It is really fun to do! Familyjournals 00:13, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm working to help w/ your trouble

I've been forwarded some e-mails showing some trouble you've been having from another user stemming from his ideas of what your content should look like. ;)  I appreciate your patience with this really rotten situation. I'm studying some policies and procedures Wikipedia has that will prevent this kind of thing in the future. I just wanted you to know I am on the case, but it'll take some time because I'm incredibly stacked up with tasks right now. Ritcheymt 12:19, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

We need your opinion

In order to help the community arrive at consensus on some issues impacting most of the pages on FamilySearch Wiki, I'd like to invite you to add your opinions to the following discussions:

Thanks! Ritcheymt 12:13, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

What's your best work? And your favorites from others?

Hey there FamilyJournals! I'm searching for the wiki's best content to highlight it during a presentation I'm doing soon. Will you link me to a couple articles you've contributed to that you are most pleased with? Also, could you link me to your favorite article(s) written by others? Thanks! Ritcheymt 17:06, 8 July 2009 (UTC)