User talk:JamesAnderson

From FamilySearch Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
(Soliciting James' opinion)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Use this page to discuss things with me about some of the topics below that I have an interest in seeing happen with the FamilySearch Research Wiki.  
 
Use this page to discuss things with me about some of the topics below that I have an interest in seeing happen with the FamilySearch Research Wiki.  
 +
 +
== Soliciting your opinion  ==
 +
 +
Hey James, will you weigh in on [[FamilySearch Wiki talk:Manual of Style#.22Local_Histories.22_or_.22Histories.22_heading_on_county_pages.3F|"Local Histories" or "Histories" heading on county pages?]] I want to reach consensus on this quickly in order to get a big missionary team engaged in [[FamilySearch Wiki:WikiProject Linking to Books in the BYU Family History Archives|FamilySearch Wiki:WikiProject Linking to Books in the BYU Family History Archives]]. Thanks in advance! [[User:Ritcheymt|Ritcheymt]] 13:46, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
  
 
== Search Engine Optimization and the FamilySearch Research Wiki  ==
 
== Search Engine Optimization and the FamilySearch Research Wiki  ==
Line 9: Line 13:
 
Hey James, thanks for the message on my User Talk page about the Maryland Maps search results from Google! You're awesome! [[User:Ritcheymt|Ritcheymt]] 15:14, 8 January 2009 (UTC)  
 
Hey James, thanks for the message on my User Talk page about the Maryland Maps search results from Google! You're awesome! [[User:Ritcheymt|Ritcheymt]] 15:14, 8 January 2009 (UTC)  
  
James, thanks for the message about the ISBN glitch! [[User:Ritcheymt|Ritcheymt]] 21:31, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
+
James, thanks for the message about the ISBN glitch! [[User:Ritcheymt|Ritcheymt]] 21:31, 15 January 2009 (UTC)  
  
Thank you James! I had actually already used that interment.net information on the Washington County page. Those cemeteries on that page are from various transcriptions, most are from findagrave but there are a few surprises in there. I appreciate your interest! Thank you. Michael's right! You're awesome!<br>
+
Thank you James! I had actually already used that interment.net information on the Washington County page. Those cemeteries on that page are from various transcriptions, most are from findagrave but there are a few surprises in there. I appreciate your interest! Thank you. Michael's right! You're awesome!<br>[[User:Familyjournals|Familyjournals]] 03:19, 9 February 2009 (UTC
[[User:Familyjournals|Familyjournals]] 03:19, 9 February 2009 (UTC
+

Revision as of 14:00, 17 May 2009

Use this page to discuss things with me about some of the topics below that I have an interest in seeing happen with the FamilySearch Research Wiki.

Soliciting your opinion

Hey James, will you weigh in on "Local Histories" or "Histories" heading on county pages? I want to reach consensus on this quickly in order to get a big missionary team engaged in FamilySearch Wiki:WikiProject Linking to Books in the BYU Family History Archives. Thanks in advance! Ritcheymt 13:46, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Search Engine Optimization and the FamilySearch Research Wiki

Making sure that one can find content in the FamilySearch Wiki and having updates appear in search engines within a day or two after they are either first put on the Wiki or the page update has been made.  There are some problems at the present, as I've heard a report that Google only spiders the site about once every 15 days at present.  Given the frequency the site is updated, it should be happening at least every other day.  What can be done to make that happen?

Messages from others

Hey James, thanks for the message on my User Talk page about the Maryland Maps search results from Google! You're awesome! Ritcheymt 15:14, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

James, thanks for the message about the ISBN glitch! Ritcheymt 21:31, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you James! I had actually already used that interment.net information on the Washington County page. Those cemeteries on that page are from various transcriptions, most are from findagrave but there are a few surprises in there. I appreciate your interest! Thank you. Michael's right! You're awesome!
Familyjournals 03:19, 9 February 2009 (UTC