West Virginia Deaths and Burials, Coverage Table (FamilySearch Historical Records)Edit This Page

From FamilySearch Wiki

Revision as of 19:41, 31 July 2013 by Douglasmichaelcu (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Coverage Table



The Coverage Table shows the places and time periods of the original records in this collection. The table indicates how many records the collection has from each place. Most of the records in the collection are from the time periods listed in the table; however, the collection may have a few records from before or after the time period.

Information about this collection is available in the wiki article West Virginia Deaths and Burials (FamilySearch Historical Records)

Locality Births and Christenings, 1853-1928 Marriages, 1854-1932 Deaths and Burials, 1854-1932
Barbour 279 499 461
Berkeley 7,644 5,194 3,117
Boone 418 5,310 0
Braxton 7,877 586 1,997
Brooke 320 12,013 159
Cabell 3,048 208 498
Calhoun 5,277 873 0
Clay 594 1,533 0
Doddridge 0 772 0
Fayette 1,593 1,664 0
Gilmer 108 147 0
Grant 430 278 0
Greenbrier 17,846 16,162 0
Hampshire 265 3,961 0
Hancock 471 10,419 0
Hardy 422 408 588
Harrison 54,759 23,812 3,642
Jackson 651 0 0
Jefferson 102 0 0
Kanawha 10,186 0 0
Lewis 361 0 0
Lincoln 1,019 0 0
Logan 644 0 0
Marion 17,151 7,364 5,524
Marshall 2,722 647 378
Mason 3,426 0 231
McDowell 664 0 0
Mercer 2,471 333 333
Mineral 308 0 0
Mingo 482 0 0
Monongalia 4,453 277 5,702
Monroe 361 0 0
Morgan 685 0 0
Nicholas 475 0 0
Ohio 4,148 0 703
Pendleton 409 0 0
Preston 123 0 0
Putnam 1,768 0 0
Raleigh 1,285 190 124
Randolph 1,600 270 130
Ritchie 1,431 0 281
Roane 450 0 0
Summers 717 0 0
Taylor 2,121 0 221
Tucker 115 0 0
Tyler 110 4,859 0
Upshur 949 0 0
Wayne 643 0 0
Webster 603 0 0
West Virginia 373,644 95,712 29,202
Wetzel 1,674 225 278
Wirt 1,425 468 173
Wood 3,523 9,077 2,946
Wyoming 339 117 0
Totals 544,589 203,378 56,688

 

Need additional research help? Contact our research help specialists.

Need wiki, indexing, or website help? Contact our product teams.


Did you find this article helpful?

You're invited to explain your rating on the discussion page (you must be signed in).