User group meeting agenda 10 February 2009
- 1 Proposing ideas for this agenda
- 2 Agenda
- 2.1 Administrative items
- 2.2 Information items
- 2.3 Discussion items
Proposing ideas for this agenda
To propose or discuss ideas for this agenda, please use the Discussion tab above. As the meeting draws near, we will review the items proposed on the Discussions page and decide which ones should get highest priority on the agenda.
- Assignment of time keeper and note taker
- Introduction of new members: 10 seconds for name and desired takeaways.
- Prayer --
- Review of Minutes
- Today's agenda preview
How to copy spreadsheets into the wiki
This item will be covered by Anne Roach. See Copy Spreadsheets into the Wiki.
Top Wiki contributors in January
Ritcheymt will share a spreadsheet report showing the top contributors in January.
Next week's meeting: Internet only! No face to face meeting!
Our user group meeting next week will be Internet only. There will be no face to face meeting in the Joseph Smith Building -- no projector, no laptops, no people sitting around a table. We're doing this so we can focus on (and suffer through) the Web-based tools so we'll 1) put remote members of the user group on the same footing as HQ-based members, and 2) be motivated to improve the sound used for the remote group. Ritcheymt 15:23, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
I agree that we should have sample forms on the Wiki such as the Family Group Sheet found on Family group record: roadmap for researchers. However, should these forms have the LDS Ordinances box? It seems like it might be better to have non-LDS specific ones and then an alternate way of getting to the LDS specific. This was an off-line discussion between Lise, Thomas, & Jimmy.
Familysearch.org links: What can we do to make the work easier should they change the URLs to the record sets on that site? Seems like we are going to have links on a large number of locality pages and maybe a few others as data sets get added there. Whenever they change the URL there, there are going to be all kinds of broken links. JamesAnderson 02:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
I think we need Jim Greene and Don Stringham to address this, James. Ritcheymt 15:27, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Communication breakdown between the User group and the group assignments. Jimmy Parker and David Samuelse. dsammy 03:51, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Linking directly to catalog -- should we or shouldn't we? I've been doing so only when I want to direct the Wiki users to a specific portion of a large collection. Should we not even be doing that? Jbparker 15:06, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Carryover from Last Week
Linking to Record Search
There was a discussion on the linking to familysearch.org and familysearch.org some months ago in a flurry of emails. The decision came down, linking only to labs.familysearch.org only because the pilot is in essence a temporary holding place. dsammy 03:53, 10 February 2009 (UTC)