Difference between revisions of "FamilySearch Wiki:Featured article candidates"
|Line 157:||Line 157:|
===Share Your Knowledge===
=== Share Your Knowledge ===
Revision as of 22:57, 11 February 2013
|To Do: review/change process so that it is suitable for the Research Wiki|
Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedback by listing it at Peer review. Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter and sources to deal with objections during the FAC process. Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article prior to a nomination. Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly.
An article should not be on Featured article candidates and Peer review or Good article nominations at the same time. Please do not split FAC review pages into subsections using header code (if necessary, use bolded headings).
An editor is allowed to be the sole nominator of only one article at a time; however, they may have two nominations active if they are a conominator on at least one of them. If a nomination is archived, the nominator(s) should take adequate time to work on resolving issues before re-nominating. None of its nominators may nominate or conominate any article for two weeks unless given leave to do so by a delegate; if such an article is nominated without asking for leave, a delegate will decide whether to remove it. Nominators whose nominations are archived with no (or minimal) feedback will be given exemptions.
The FA committee determines the timing of the process for each nomination. For a nomination to be promoted to FA status, consensus must be reached that it meets the criteria. Consensus is built among reviewers and nominators; the committee determines whether there is consensus. A nomination will be removed from the list and archived if, in the judgment of the committee:
It is assumed that all nominations have good qualities; this is why the main thrust of the process is to generate and resolve critical comments in relation to the criteria, and why such resolution is given considerably more weight than declarations of support.
Nominations Unreviewed by Committee
Find a great page that you want others to see? Put a link here and we will check them out!
These articles have met criteria of bronze star featured articles
Japan Research MethodsHoe To*
Netherlands SocietiesHow To*
Victoria Archives and Libraries How To*
How To & Help Articles
Find A GraveFA*
Pedigree Resource FileHow To*
Sexton RecordsHow To*
United States and Canada
Quebec Notarial RecordsHow To*
United States Military Records How To*
United States NewspapersHow To*
Virginia Probate Records FA*(fix catagory link)
War of 1812, 1812 to 1815 How To*