Difference between revisions of "FamilySearch Wiki:Neutral point of view"

From FamilySearch Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(grammar)
(add image)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Policy}}  
 
{{Policy}}  
 
+
<br/>
 +
[[File:POV.png|100px|right]]
 
FamilySearch Wiki is about how to find, use, and analyze records of genealogical value. Its articles should be written in a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NPOV neutral point of view] to the fullest extent possible. However, genealogical advice is subjective by nature. What are the three best record sources to find the parents of an ancestor who lived in Pennsylvania in 1883? Ask two experts and you're likely to get two different answers.  
 
FamilySearch Wiki is about how to find, use, and analyze records of genealogical value. Its articles should be written in a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NPOV neutral point of view] to the fullest extent possible. However, genealogical advice is subjective by nature. What are the three best record sources to find the parents of an ancestor who lived in Pennsylvania in 1883? Ask two experts and you're likely to get two different answers.  
  
Line 8: Line 9:
  
 
*[[FamilySearch Wiki:Guiding Principles]]
 
*[[FamilySearch Wiki:Guiding Principles]]
 +
 +
{{Policies and guidelines}}

Latest revision as of 12:33, 24 November 2011

Green check.png This page explains a policy, a widely accepted standard that all contributors should normally follow.

Please visit the talk page to add comments or suggestions for further development of the policy.


POV.png

FamilySearch Wiki is about how to find, use, and analyze records of genealogical value. Its articles should be written in a neutral point of view to the fullest extent possible. However, genealogical advice is subjective by nature. What are the three best record sources to find the parents of an ancestor who lived in Pennsylvania in 1883? Ask two experts and you're likely to get two different answers.

That's where community comes in. The reliability of subjective articles increases as more experts join in conversation. Any article that should be reviewed for its neutrality can be flagged with the {{Pov}} template.

See also