FamilySearch Wiki:WikiProject Feedback
Call For Feedback!
We need your feedback! Our goal is to make wiki.familysearch.org a friendly, welcoming place that is easy for you to use and make contributions. Please leave your comments regarding the ease of use and/or contributing to the wiki. What is your experience? What challenges do you face in doing what you want to do? Where do you find help? This is the page for making comments on the problems.
To post comments for the answers you recommend, please go to What New Users and Contributors Want to Make Wiki Easier. Then, please add your "Vote" for what you feel is most urgent and important at Newbies Priorities. Experienced user/contributor feedback on early, new user experiences is also needed. This page is not placed on forums.familysearch.org to simplify access for newbies.
Please feel free to sign your comments or leave them annonymous. Kara aka CK Whipple 17:40, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- The wiki is hard to use because it is hard to figure out the best way to search. Perhaps add a few tips on how to search.
- Don't like having to sign in again to link to the forum.
- The wiki is not easy to use and it is a complicated editing process with wikitext.
- The first screen (home page) needs to be more user friendly and inviting.
- We need contact with a person who knows it to help us learn.
- I would like to see more edit options on the tool bar and less working in wikitext. (techie person)
- The help feature on the home page needs to stand out. Currently it blends in with all of the other material on the Home Page
- I'll be honest, I feel like contributing to the wiki is boring. I have passion about genealogy but can't see how that translates to contributing to the wiki.
- The wiki is beige and boring.
- Hard to find "how to topics"
- I liked how easy it is to edit what other contributors have done. But it is hard to make brand new contributions yourself.
- Wiki needs easily creatable formats for new pages.
- Wiki is bland - it needs to look more creative.
- The wiki has incomplete and cryptic information and unsure lead-in to it. Needs to open with 10-15 research categories to stimulate and direct the user.
- Too complicated and circurtous.
- Too much training required to even start - discouraging. Needs to be 1 2 3 done.
- Need clear meaningful categories of real interest up front. Step-by-step, simple and attractive. Don't bury links in sentences or paragraphs. The countries are good, especialy USA but general and incomplete. The map to the States is great!
- Wiki needs to start out with a better opening. One in a country or category it gets better.
- The wiki needs a "Here's what you will love" opening matrix, if possible.
- It's too hard to figure out hat to put in the search box without suggestions.
- The site needs color.
- I couldn't figure out the rules and was afraid to contribute and break one.
- When I first tried to explore the site I got lost or was refused entry.
- You need training to use it.
- The "Help" needs to be more visible and more helpful.
- I had a hard time finding "Home". Most sites have it on top center or left to easily get back to the home page.
- Editing is hard. I couldn't find training or support. The wiki really needs quick guides on how to edit.
- The wiki could use a video to help train on how to use it.
- If I want to contribute but it is too hard, could I email the information to someone and they could enter it for me?
- As far as foreign language research goes, other websits are more thorough like genealogy.net. Most serious contributors are outside of the USA and are not capable to contribute in English. Societies or individuals who want to contribute something usually have their own sites or contibute through societies.
- To introduce a new person to this wiki, if you are familiar with computers, this is still a problem. It takes a long time to learn how to do this program. Originally it was a little easier with the portal pages. Now, as I introduce others to this program, they still have difficulty finding what they want. A specific research problem, or area both involved.