Difference between revisions of "User talk:AndersonLH"
(Thanks from the wiki:)
|(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)|
|Line 34:||Line 34:|
== Thanks from the wiki: ==
== Thanks from the wiki: ==
The [[FamilySearch Research Wiki]] is delighted to let you know that the [[Norway]]
The [[FamilySearch Research Wiki]] is delighted to let you know that the[[Norway]]you helped create has become a '''[[Featured Article]]''', highlighted on the [[Main Page]] of the Wiki, and will remain there for seven days. Thank you for your excellent work to help others quickly access records. Your contributions are appreciated and willothers their ancestors.
Latest revision as of 22:28, 15 September 2011
- 1 What's your best work? And your favorites from others?
- 2 Where should wikiproject contributors communicate?
- 3 Please vote on new name for Reviewer role
- 4 Weigh in on FamilySearch Wiki talk:Naming a Project?
- 5 Please vote on search result title link color
- 6 Nice information on Herdla
- 7 Thanks from the wiki:
What's your best work? And your favorites from others?
Hey there Mormor! I'm searching for the wiki's best content to highlight it during a presentation I'm doing soon. Will you link me to a couple articles you've contributed to that you are most pleased with? Also, could you link me to your favorite article(s) written by others? Thanks! Ritcheymt 17:06, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Where should wikiproject contributors communicate?
People who work on writing projects on the wiki are asking for an online venue they can use to talk about...
- how to organize projects,
- how and where to recruit contributors
- how to motivate project members
- how to track progress on projects
- Manual of Style issues that we need to settle to avoid rework
- ...and other stuff.
Could you go to the wiki feedback forum and give your opinion as to what tool(s) we should choose to communicate? The thread where we will discuss this is Which tools for wikiproject contributors to communicate? Ritcheymt 16:24, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Please vote on new name for Reviewer role
The wiki community is voting on a proposed renaming of the Reviewer role so that we can give the role to anyone we trust to upload their own images without review. If you care about the name of this role, please discuss the issue and cast your vote at FamilySearch Wiki talk:Reviewer. Ritcheymt 16:47, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Weigh in on FamilySearch Wiki talk:Naming a Project?
Project pages are getting hard to find because people are putting them in multiple namespaces and using all kinds of naming conventions. Would you mind weighing in on FamilySearch Wiki talk:Naming a Project? Thanks! Ritcheymt 00:18, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Some users have reported that the red color of the article title links in search results are confusing because in a Mediawiki site, a red link means a link to a page that has no content. There is a poll on the forums as to whether to make the links blue instead, which would also conform to what Google and Bing do. Please read the thread/explanation and vote. RitcheyMT 16:26, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Nice information on Herdla
Hi AndersonLH! Thanks for posting information on Herdla! Do you have any questions or have you run into any issues as you edit wiki pages? I'll be happy to help with any information you need! RitcheyMT 22:01, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks from the wiki:
The FamilySearch Research Wiki is delighted to let you know that the "Norway" article you helped create has become a Featured Article, highlighted on the Main Page of the Wiki, and will remain there for seven days. Thank you for your excellent work to help others quickly access records. Your contributions are appreciated and will assist others in finding their ancestors.
You have made a difference in research!