User talk:Klk3

From FamilySearch Wiki
Revision as of 11:56, 20 May 2012 by Klk3 (talk | contribs) (added discussion convention template)

Jump to: navigation, search

Talk Conventions

  • Please post new messages at the bottom of the page to prevent confusion.
  • Please sign your comments. Type ~~~~ after your text.
  • Please use section headings to separate conversation topics.

See: Wikiquette, Be nice, and Talk page guidelines.

Start a new talk topic.
Please post your comments on this page by clicking the link above. This will automatically format the page so all you have to do is type your comments.

Help Page Edit

Ken ...  I see you found the terminology page and cleaned it up.  I would have probably remembered (maybe) 2 years from now !!   Thanks so much for jumping in and helping.  Welcome to the team.  Jane evancol 19:32, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

A Thank You

In the Amdoc # 2326162 is a thank you. I believe it is for you as the message(Email) was sent out in the time you signed up to work.  Thanks for me too.   Sandralpond 13:19, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Langley, Norfolk

I have responded to your question about updating Norfolk content to reflect the FamilySearch Records online collections which have been published since the first publication of a proportion of parish registers in the Diocese of Norwich. As a local contributor familiar with the catalogue of the Norfolk holdings for over 30 years I can contribute some knowledge but you would need to question the management of FamilySearch how they intend to revise pages in wiki as they publish large amounts of material online. FamilySearch offers these under a "Records" tab at website but clearly parts of the organisation refer to Historical Records and before that came about some English records were online at Record Search. Perhaps in the rebranding of the FamilySearch site this confusion was overlooked but it is confusing for researchers and local contributors alike to encounter an apparent inability to manage change on the sites offered by FamilySearch. I have offered a revision to the best of my ability for Langley Church Records.

Anything you can discuss with your colleagues within FamilySearch to improve the present confusion would be most welcome.

Royalsarah 11:04, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Records template

Thank You for pointing out that a template now exists which brings issues to the attention of that arm of Family Search involved in Records collections.

In view of the lack of response for information about various collections in Kent I am reaching a point of ceasing further contributions to this project. The failure to identify content in England, Kent, Workhouse Records (FamilySearch Historical Records) in particular means that I cannot second guess which records I have handled for years may or may not be part of this collection and cannot therefore contribute my knowledge. {{Records question}} Since I am credited with research on Workhouses in the county elsewhere on the internet it is regrettable that your organisation has failed to respond to requests over a number of months. Penshurst 09:22, 16 March 2012 (UTC)